Reference lists¶
A. Afanasyev and E. Vedeneeva. Compositional modeling of multicomponent gas injection into saline aquifers with the mufits simulator. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 94:103988, 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.103988.
E. Ahmed, O. Møyner, X. Raynaud, and H.M. Nilsen. Phase behavior and black-oil simulations of hydrogen storage in saline aquifers. Advances in Water Resources, 191:104772, 2024. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0309170824001593, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2024.104772.
Mujahid Ali, Muhammad Arif, Rossen Sedev, Mónica Sánchez-Román, Alireza Keshavarz, and Stefan Iglauer. Underground hydrogen storage: the microbiotic influence on rock wettability. Journal of Energy Storage, 72:108405, 2023. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X23018029, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.108405.
R. H. Brooks and A. T. Corey. Hydraulic properties of porous media. Colorado State University Hydrology Paper. Colorado State University, Colorado, pages 1–37, 1964.
R. H. Brooks and A. T. Corey. Properties of porous media affecting fluid. J. Irrigation Drainage Div., 92(2):61–90, 1966.
S. Chabab, J. L. Cruz, M. Poulain, M. Ducousso, F. Contamine, J. P. Serin, and P. Cézac. Thermodynamic modeling of mutual solubilities in gas-laden brines systems containing co2, ch4, n2, o2, h2, h2o, nacl, cacl2, and kcl: application to degassing in geothermal processes. Energies, 2021. URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/17/5239, doi:10.3390/en14175239.
S. Chabab, H. Kerkache, I. Bouchkira, M. Poulain, O. Baudouin, E. Moine, M. Ducousso, H. Hoang, G. Galliéro, and P. Cézac. Solubility of h2 in water and nacl brine under subsurface storage conditions: measurements and thermodynamic modeling. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 50:648–658, 2024. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319923054976, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.10.290.
S. Chabab, P. Théveneau, C. Coquelet, J. Corvisier, and P. Paricaud. Measurements and predictive models of high-pressure h2 solubility in brine (h2o+nacl) for underground hydrogen storage application. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(56):32206–32220, 2020. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319920332195, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.192.
S. Chabab, P. Théveneau, J. Corvisier, C. Coquelet, P. Paricaud, C. Houriez, and E. El Ahmar. Thermodynamic study of the co2 – h2o – nacl system: measurements of co2 solubility and modeling of phase equilibria using soreide and whitson, electrolyte cpa and sit models. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 91:102825, 2019. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1750583619302622, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.102825.
Nicole Dopffel, Kyle Mayers, Abduljelil Kedir, Edin Alagic, Biwen Annie An-Stepec, Ketil Djurhuus, Daniel Boldt, Janiche Beeder, and Silvan Hoth. Microbial hydrogen consumption leads to a significant ph increase under high-saline-conditions: implications for hydrogen storage in salt caverns. Scientific Reports, 13(1):10564, 2023.
P. Dornseiffer, B. Meyer, and E. Heinzle. Modeling of anaerobic formate kinetics in mixed biofilm culture using dynamic membrane mass spectrometric measurement. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 45(3):219–228, 1995.
A. Ebigbo, Golfier F., and Quintard M. A coupled, pore-scale model for methanogenic microbial activity in underground hydrogen storage. Advances in Water Resources, 61:74–85, 2013.
N. Eddaoui. Patterns in bioreactive transport in underground storage of hydrogen : impact of natural and induced heterogeneity. PhD thesis, Université de Lorraine en cotutelle avec Université Hassan II (Casablanca, Maroc), 2021. Thèse de doctorat dirigée par Panfilov, Mikhail et Aniss, Saïd Mécanique - Génie civil Université de Lorraine 2021. URL: http://www.theses.fr/2021LORR0244/document.
N. Eddaoui, M. Panfilov, L. Ganzer, and B. Hagemann. Impact of pore clogging by bacteria on underground hydrogen storage. Transport in Porous Media, 139:89–108, 2021. doi:10.1007/s11242-021-01647-6.
S.O. Elferink, R.N. Maas, H. Harmsen, and A.J. Stams. Desulforhab-dus amnigenus gen. nov. sp. nov. a sulfate reducer isolated from anaerobic granular sludge. Archives of microbiology, 164(2):119–124, 1995.
S.O. Elferink, A. Visser, L.W.H. Pol, and A.J. Stams. Sulfate reduction in methanogenic bioreactors. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 15(2-3):119–136, 1994.
B. Hagemann. Numerical and Analytical Modeling of Gas Mixing and Bio-Reactive Transport during Underground Hydrogen Storage. Theses, Université de Lorraine, Jul 2017. URL: https://theses.hal.science/tel-01735019.
S. Hogeweg, G. Strobel, and B. Hagemann. Benchmark study for the simulation of underground hydrogen storage operations. Computational Geosciences, 26(6):1367–1378, 12 2022. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-022-10163-5, doi:10.1007/s10596-022-10163-5.
Sebastian Hogeweg, Birger Hagemann, Vadim Bobrov, and Leonhard Ganzer. Development and calibration of a bio-geo-reactive transport model for uhs. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12:1385273, 2024.
F. Karadagli and B.E. Rittmann. Kinetic characterization of methanobacterium bryantii moh. Environmental science & technology, 39(13):4900–4905, 2005.
N. Khoshnevis, S. Hogeweg, C. Goncalves Machado, and B. Hagemann. Numerical modeling of bio-reactive transport during underground hydrogen storage – a benchmark study. European Association of Geoscientists &Engineers, 1:1–5, 2023. doi:https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.202321087.
O.R. Kotsyurbenko, M.V. Glagolev, A.N. Nozhevnikova, and R. Conrad. Competition between homoacetogenic bacteria and methanogenic archaea for hydrogen at low temperature. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 38(2-3):153–159, 2001. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00893.x.
J.K. Kristjansson, P. Schönheit, and R.K. Thauer. Different ks values for hydrogen of methanogenic bacteria and sulfate reducing bacteria: an explanation for the apparent inhibition of methanogenesis by sulfate. Archives of Microbiology, 131(3):278–282, 1982.
S. Krogstad, K.-A. Lie, O. Møyner, H.M. Nilsen, X. Raynaud, and B. Skaflestad. Mrst-ad–an open-source framework for rapid prototyping and evaluation of reservoir simulation problems. In 2015 SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2015.
Lloyd L Lee. Molecular Thermodynamics of Electrolyte Solutions. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, 2nd edition, 2021. URL: https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/12181, arXiv:https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/12181, doi:10.1142/12181.
Knut-Andreas Lie. An Introduction to Reservoir Simulation Using MATLAB/GNU Octave: User Guide for the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox (MRST). Cambridge University Press, 2019.
J. Monod. The growth of bacterial cultures. Annual Reviews in Microbiology, 3(1):371–394, 1949.
O. Møyner and H.A. Tchelepi. A mass-conservative sequential implicit multiscale method for isothermal equation-of-state compositional problems. SPE Journal, 23(06):2376–2393, 2018.
Olav Møyner. Compositional simulation with the ad-oo framework. Advanced Modeling with the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox, pages 324–374, 2021.
Olav Møyner. Better ad simulators with flexible state functions and accurate discretizations. In Knut-Andreas Lie and Olav Møyner, editors, Advanced Modelling with the MATLAB Reservoir Simulation Toolbox, chapter 5, pages 151–191. Cambridge University Press, 2021.
M. Panfilov. Physicochemical Fluid Dynamics in Porous Media: Applications in Geosciences and Petroleum Engineering. Wiley-VCH, 2018.
A. Rahbari, J. Brenkman, R. Hens, M. Ramdin, L.J. van den Broeke, R. Schoon, R. Henkes, O.A. Moultos, and T.J.H. Vlugt. Solubility of water in hydrogen at high pressures: a molecular simulation study. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 64(9):4103–4115, 2019. URL: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.9b00513, arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.9b00513, doi:10.1021/acs.jced.9b00513.
A.F. Rasmussen, T.H. Sandve, K. Bao, A. Lauser, J. Hove, B. Skaflestad, R. Klöfkorn, M. Blatt, A.B. Rustad, O. Sævareid, K.-A. Lie, and A. Thune. The open porous media flow reservoir simulator. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 81:159–185, 2021. Development and Application of Open-source Software for Problems with Numerical PDEs. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898122120302182, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.05.014.
J.A. Robinson and J.M. Tiedje. Competition between sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria for h2 under resting and growing conditions. Archives of microbiology, 137(1):26–32, 1984.
Zohreh Safari, Rouhollah Fatehi, and Reza Azin. Developing a numerical model for microbial methanation in a depleted hydrocarbon reservoir. Renewable Energy, 227:120426, 2024. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124004919, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120426.
A.J.M. Stams, S.O. Elferink, and P. Westermann. Metabolic interactions between methanogenic consortia and anaerobic respiring bacteria. In Biomethanation I, :31–56, 2003.
I. Søreide and C.H. Whitson. Peng-robinson predictions for hydrocarbons, co2, n2, and h2 s with pure water and naci brine. Fluid Phase Equilibria, 77:217–240, 1992. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037838129285105H, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3812(92)85105-H.
Eike M. Thaysen, Sean McMahon, Gion J. Strobel, Ian B. Butler, Bryne T. Ngwenya, Niklas Heinemann, Mark Wilkinson, Aliakbar Hassanpouryouzband, Christopher I. McDermott, and Katriona Edlmann. Estimating microbial growth and hydrogen consumption in hydrogen storage in porous media. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 151:111481, 2021. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121007620, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111481.
V.A. Vavilin, L.Y. Lokshina, S.V. Rytov, O.R. Kotsyurbenko, and A.N. Nozhevnikova. Description of two-step kinetics in methane formation during psychrophilic h2/co2 and mesophilic glucose conversions. Bioresource technology, 71(3):195–209, 2000.
D.V. Voskov and H.A. Tchelepi. Comparison of nonlinear formulations for two-phase multi-component eos based simulation. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 82-83:101–111, 2012. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920410511002683, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2011.10.012.
C. Wulf, J. Linssen, and P. Zapp. Chapter 9 - power-to-gas—concepts, demonstration, and prospects. In Catherine Azzaro-Pantel, editor, Hydrogen Supply Chains, pages 309–345. Academic Press, 2018. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128111970000099, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811197-0.00009-9.
Xiaofei Zhao, Yuxin Tang, Xinwei Tian, Maozheng He, Xuefang Li, Yun Peng, Lei Li, and Shangyi Zhang. Improved mathematical model simulates methane production during anaerobic digestion of food waste under stable and unstable acidification conditions. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 13(2):115833, 2025.